Lessons for Clean-up Ganga from Springfield

Fri, 2015-10-30 12:21 -- SCC India Staff

River Ganga

The lack of infrastructure may be turned to an advantage, with the right combination of funding and enlightened planning.

We venerate Ganga and other rivers, recognising water is essential to life, yet they remain heavily polluted. Domestic waste accounts for 80 per cent of pollutants in Ganga. Some reach the river via sanitary sewers, some by direct dumping.

A significant route by which domestic waste is entering Ganga and other rivers is through wet-weather flows. When it rains, street waste- including that from open defecation is washed into the river, either directly or via storm sewers. In addition to human waste urban wet-weather flows are a cocktail of other substances, such as motor oil, rags and grit, which build up in our city streets. In rural areas wet-weather flows will carry pollutants such a fertiliser and pesticides.

The other 20 per cent of pollution in Ganga is industrial. It has been estimated that approximately 1 billion litres of untreated sewage are dumped into Ganga on a daily basis.

The lack of infrastructure at the root of much river pollution may be turned to an advantage, with the right combination of funding and enlightened planning. Because so much of our infrastructure spend is on new-build projects, we have the opportunity to adopt state-of-the-art technology that has been time-tested in full-scale facilities.

One such approach to treating wet-weather flows can be found in Springfield, Ohio, USA. The city recently added an enhanced high-rate treatment (EHRT) facility featuring the world´s largest compressible media filtration (CMF) system.

The innovative project has added significant peak wet-weather flow capacity- 380 million litres a day (ML/d)- to Springfield's publicly owned treatment works, and serves to reduce untreated overflows into the local river.

Moreover, the CMF technology is fully automated, does not require clarification chemicals, and its capital and operating costs are a fraction of those associated with an expansion using conventional storage, conveyance and treatment technologies.

The lesson from Springfield: overflow treatment facilities that incorporate best-fit advances in technology can offer a cost-effective alternative to new storage and conveyance infrastructure. The Mad River flows through Springfield and is the largest cold water fishery in Ohio.

Its watershed drains more than 1,550 sq km. About two-thirds of it is used as crop and pasture land, one-fifth for urban use.

Water quality in the Mad River watershed is affected by many sources, including excessive nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus from fertilisers, animal waste and sewage. Polluted run-off from urban and agricultural areas is a culprit as is excess siltation resulting from stream channelisation.

Springfield is served by a waste-water treatment plant that has an average design flow of 95 ML/d and provides treatment of dry-weather flows through conventional preliminary, primary, trickling filters and nitrifying activated sludge processes.

The plant has overflow weirs that discharges excess wet-weather flows largely untreated to the Mad River. Most of Springfield´s collection system is separate sanitary sewers, but about 22 per cent of the system consists of combined sanitary and storm sewers, including 57 combined sewer overflow (CSO) outfalls.

During wet weather events when infiltration and inflow (I/I) through the combined sewers exceeds capacity, discharges through the CSO outfalls go untreated into the river. CSOs impacting the Mad River were about 3.8 billion litres a year in 2000.

Springfield developed a long-term control plan (LTCP), to increase its wet-weather flow capacity and its control of untreated CSOs to the Mad River. The plan recommended the addition of EHRT facilities as part of a range of treatment plant improvements.

Dynamic influent characterisation and full-plant dynamic process modelling was conducted to predict performance and evaluate impacts to the existing liquid and biosolids treatment facilities during wet-weather events.

Alternatives were evaluated for the new EHRT facilities. Equipment bids were solicited for solids contact high-rate clarification, ballasted flocculation and CMF. Conceptual facility designs for the technology alternatives were developed and evaluated for economic and non-economic factors. It was determined that lifecycle costs were within seven per cent of each other.

Click Here to read the full article

Also read

Smart Water for Aurangabad City

New report predicts murky future for global water quality